I get that there won’t be any security updates. So any problem found can be exploited. But how high is the chance for problems for an average user if you say, only browse some safe websites? If you have a pc you don’t really care much about, without any personal information? It feels like the danger is more theoretical than what will actually happen.

Or… are there any examples of people (not corpos) getting wrecked in the past by an eol OS?

  • slazer2au
    link
    English
    197 months ago

    This is kinda a bad argument as a regular user will not connect to the internet like this. You have a router or a carrier will have a CGN in front of your PC.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      18
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      You have a router or a carrier will have a CGN in front of your PC.

      Many are using ipv6 these days, so no CGNAT used. Potentially with some level of protection (particularly in the mobile case), but there isn’t a 100% guarantee.

      • slazer2au
        link
        English
        07 months ago

        But you are still going to have some form of statefull firewall, where this video the firewall was deliberately disabled.

        • @Crashumbc
          link
          English
          117 months ago

          This is like saying I can leave my front door unlocked because we have a neighborhood watch…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      117 months ago

      I think the common use case is telephones. Attaching your old cell phone to a random open Wi-Fi network is pretty common

      But this is just a demonstration, it’s still applies to using the internet, interacting with the network is the danger. Not how you interact with it. Browsing websites can send exploit payloads to your outdated software.

    • lemmyng
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      The number of users connecting their PC forfeit directly to the modem or purposefully disabling all protections because they’re too lazy is higher than you think.

      • AggressivelyPassive
        link
        fedilink
        47 months ago

        I would suspect, hardly anyone who knows how to do that is stupid enough to do it.

        Most modems/ISP routers are relatively secure by default.

      • slazer2au
        link
        English
        37 months ago

        Carrier operated modems are run in NAT mode so a home PC will get a RFC1918 IP address not public routable ones

    • Prison Mike
      link
      fedilink
      26 months ago

      How is CGN going to stop you from downloading some exploit? CGN as well as NAT might have some level of security but it’s by no means a firewall or anti-exploit framework.

      • slazer2au
        link
        English
        16 months ago

        You didn’t watch the video. Give it a watch then you will understand why I said that.

    • @Brkdncr
      link
      17 months ago

      Not ipv6. Sometimes it’s just routed to you depending on your router.