• SatansMaggotyCumFart
    link
    17 months ago

    What is the point of this article you posted?

    Can you summarize in a simple sentence?

    • @fukhuesonOP
      link
      -27 months ago

      The ICC’s current action is considered by the author to potentially not lead to peace but inflame aspects of the conflict.

      The move might be one small step forward for some sort of symbolic justice, but it’s going to be a giant leap backward from reaching a far more important goal—peace.

      Can you summarize the article, with quotes directly supporting your claims, in the way you see it?

      • SatansMaggotyCumFart
        link
        37 months ago

        So you agree this article is saying there should be no consequences.

        Can you summarize the article, with quotes directly supporting your claims, in the way you see it?

        No, because it’s a trash article.

        • @fukhuesonOP
          link
          -27 months ago

          Again, that doesn’t show up in the article. I can see you want it to say that, but I’m sorry, the article is objectively not suggesting no consequences.

          • SatansMaggotyCumFart
            link
            07 months ago

            The consequences are the court ruling and the article is arguing against it.

            How do you explain that the court ruling isn’t a consequence?

            • @fukhuesonOP
              link
              -27 months ago

              No, you’re trying to conflate their disagreement with this action with the idea that they disagree with any action, which you’ve thus far been unable to support with quotes from the article.

              • SatansMaggotyCumFart
                link
                17 months ago

                Can you explain this comment to me again only using quotes by Twilight Sparkle from My Little Pony?

                  • SatansMaggotyCumFart
                    link
                    17 months ago

                    You’re asking me to support my argument using only quotes from your trash article even though I’ve explained my position to you very simply, so I’m asking for an equivalent useless exercise from you.