The US swimmer Lia Thomas, who rose to global prominence after becoming the first transgender athlete to win a NCAA college title in March 2022, has lost a legal case against World Aquatics at the court of arbitration for sport – and with it any hopes of making next month’s Paris Olympics.

The 25-year-old also remains barred from swimming in the female category after failing to overturn rules introduced by swimming’s governing body in the summer of 2022, which prohibit anyone who has undergone “any part of male puberty” from the female category.

Thomas had argued that those rules should be declared “invalid and unlawful” as they were contrary to the Olympic charter and the World Aquatics constitution.

However, in a 24-page decision, the court concluded that Thomas was “simply not entitled to engage with eligibility to compete in WA competitions” as someone who was no longer a member of US swimming.

The news was welcomed by World Aquatics, who hailed it as “a major step forward in our efforts to protect women’s sport”.

  • @SchmidtGenetics
    link
    6
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    That’s starting to sound a little like an eugenics competition….

    • Kabe
      link
      English
      -3
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I would say the opposite, in fact.

      Eugenics is the belief and practices that aim to “improve” the genetic quality of a human population to meet an idealized optimal standard. Under my proposed system, you could argue it would allow for a greater diversity of individuals that would be able to compete, and therefore would lower the necessity of having the optimal physical traits required in order to take part in each sport.

      • @SchmidtGenetics
        link
        2
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Back to the discussion. It would basically be this if we took the 10% of each and put it into 4 categories.

        Group A 85%men 15% women

        Group B 70%men 30% women

        Group C 55%men 45%women

        Group D 5%men 95%women

        It just doesn’t work. You would be hand picking less qualified men to compete with the women just to fill it up.

        • Kabe
          link
          English
          -16 months ago

          On what basis doesn’t it work, though? I’m still not sure I understand what the problem is with your example.

          You would be hand picking less qualified men to compete with the women just to fill it up.

          Another way of looking at it is that we would in fact be widening the criteria of who would be considered “qualified”.

          • @SchmidtGenetics
            link
            2
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            In only one group would the women win a significant portion of the events? You basically created an Olympics with a bottom 25% female category, and 3 male categories. The women can already compete with the men if they want to, but they want medals too, not just to be there…. The best women would be overshadowed by the best men, you would only be showing off the worst of the top female athletes.

            Expanding? When you need a d list male to compete with a b list female? Come on.

            • Kabe
              link
              English
              26 months ago

              Ah yeah, I see what you mean. Fair point.