• @Pieresqi
    link
    -517 months ago

    I received this thing which costs money for free for years and I am entitled to continue receiving it for free.

    (If yt was publicly funded or essential service I would agree. It is not.)

    • Nougat
      link
      fedilink
      297 months ago

      You do know that there were static ads on the pages, right? And the whole aggregate viewer data thing? They were never producing the service for free; they had regular old advertising and metrics to sell to fund it.

      What they didn’t have were garbage intrusive unskippable video ads before and during the video I wanted to watch.

      • @KISSmyOSFeddit
        link
        27 months ago

        What they also didn’t have was positive cash flow.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          47 months ago

          And decent video quality, do we want to go back to the days of 240p?, cause that’s the only resolution a static banner ad model can support.