… and I can’t even continue the chat from my phone.

  • @[email protected]
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -118 months ago

    This is why I moved to Telegram. Idk if it’s actually native, but often feels much more so, and less phone-centric than Signal which requires weird auth rituals involving the phone.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Personally, I’m a big fan of XMPP, due to the inherent resiliency in being decentralized/federated, and due to the security provided by OMEMO (based on signal’s algorithm). Don’t have to worry about third-parties messing with my data if it stays on my server that’s in my house.

      • Carighan Maconar
        link
        English
        4
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        People want a chat app. If your secure chat app sucks as a chat app, it doesn’t matter how secure it is. It failed the primary use case it was meant to be developed for.

        But keep in mind, Signal’s nature is no excuse to have shitty app implementations. In particular to have desktop apps as second-class citizens (and tablets as exterminated not-citizens). You can be a secure chat app. Signal got the secure part done, they’re just struggling with the chat app part.

      • @rdri
        link
        English
        18 months ago

        Signal is not an alternative to telegram and vice versa. Telegram has too many public communication features that people often use. The nature of signal will prevent it from having similar features.

    • @snake_case_lover
      link
      English
      108 months ago

      its a QT+Webview project. So C++ and JS together. Cpp doing heavy tasks while JS doing cute animatons.

    • slst
      link
      fedilink
      English
      38 months ago

      The telegram desktop app is wonderful