• @CrayonRosary
    link
    English
    87 months ago

    It should not be banned. It has legitimate therapeutic use for people with halitosis.

    • BuckFigotstheThird
      link
      English
      -127 months ago

      There are other sugar substitutes that won’t kill dogs.

      • @CrayonRosary
        link
        English
        157 months ago

        It’s not just a “sugar substitute”. It actively kills bacteria. It’s very good for your teeth, and treats halitosis.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            37 months ago

            He writes on a device that is made with child labor…

            It’s not the smell dumbo. How about you lose a few teeth and see how much you like it. If the risk of killing a some random dog you’re never going to see or touch is worth the issues of toothdecay/loss.

            This falls under the category: Your religion forbids YOU to eat bacon, it doesn’t forbid bacon for everyone else.

            • BuckFigotstheThird
              link
              English
              -7
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Holy strawman, Batman!

              Ya know what else kills bacteria in the mouth? Brushing, flossing, and using mouthwash.

              Regulate it. Got teeth so bad you need xylitol, get it from your dentist.

              • @CrayonRosary
                link
                English
                2
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                So… Someone gets it from their dentist and it still kills your dog. What changed? Nothing. It’s not a common sweetener. There are much more common sugar alcohols and plenty of other sweeteners entirely. Xylitol gum is sold specifically as xylitol gum because of it’s antibacterial properties.

          • @ZILtoid1991
            link
            English
            27 months ago

            Should we also ban chocolate then?