• Victoria Antoinette
    link
    06 months ago

    the video you linked called it strategic voting, and the real takeaway from that video is that strategic voting leads to voters having fewer choices and losing representation.

    • FaceDeer
      link
      fedilink
      16 months ago

      If they don’t vote strategically then they give the advantage to their opponents. The alternative is to take votes away from a party that doesn’t quite align with you but could win and give them instead to a party that can’t win, resulting in an increased chance of the party that doesn’t align with you at all winning.

      • Victoria Antoinette
        link
        06 months ago

        if I vote for somebody who doesnt align with me I can’t win at all.

        • FaceDeer
          link
          fedilink
          16 months ago

          It’s a question of whether you want to win somewhat or lose completely. Democracy is compromise; you’re never going to find a candidate that perfectly aligns with your interests.

          If you insist that you will only vote for a niche third-party candidate under a system like America’s, then you’ve taken yourself out of the effective voting pool. Now neither of the two candidates who has a chance of winning needs to care about your interests at all.

          • Victoria Antoinette
            link
            16 months ago

            that’s how I felt since I voted for Obama and he didn’t close gitmo. so I may as well not support them if they don’t care about me.

            • FaceDeer
              link
              fedilink
              16 months ago

              Because Romney or McCain would have been so much better?

              Those were your choices.

                • FaceDeer
                  link
                  fedilink
                  16 months ago

                  Then as I’ve said elsewhere, you’re effectively not a part of the voting population and your preferences are not reflected in the results.