• @Aceticon
    link
    2
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    The opposite of Racist is not a Racist with an opposite list of “good” and bad “races”, it’s somebody who thinks it’s not race that makes people be “good” or “bad”.

    You’re pressuming that was about you rather than me making the counter-point to the posture you were supporting.

    It’s funny that you repeatedly demanded me to point an exact statement and yet when faced with an equal demand, it was fine for you to “infer” meaning, though that was previously not fine for me to do.

    It’s called a double standard.

    Curiously and having in good faith taken that original riposte of yours (before you repeated it again, in slogan-like fashion) about me having unfairly infered something about your statement, I actually apologized for that since I had indeed presumed too much.

    Well, at least it’s well beyond doubt (certainly you exhausted the original benefit of the doubt) to me that you are not making points in good faith and what drives you in this exchange is something else than a desire for an open and fair discussion, so you do you an I’ll do me.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Motherfucker you came at me with a challenge to a position that I clearly didn’t have, and your “apology” was obviously a snide attempt to make a second equally ridiculous accusation.

      You also said I “voiced prejudice”. (EDIT: In fact, you called it an “accusation”, your words, so it wasn’t some academic detached notion that you were attacking, it was my conduct directly) Now, if that’s meant to mean something other than you accusing me of racism or whatever “geographical” prejudice is, go for it. Explain yourself.

      I never said anything prejudicial towards any group. Once again, if I did, fucking show it. Explain your working.

      So far I am working off of vague insinuations and technical "well ackshually"s from you. If you have something to say, fucking say it.