• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I mean at that point you struggle to escape, but assuming that’s definitely not possible, then sharp sticks hurt less. 🤷‍♂️ “Optimal” does not necessarily mean “good” or “desirable”.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        45 months ago

        Yeah, equally deep and long injuries with a sharper implement destroy fewer cells (since they have a smaller cross-section), cause less trauma, and are less disruptive to the surrounding tissues. I know it’s unintuitive, but it’s true.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        15 months ago

        The dull stick is going to gouge your eye out entirely. I have no frame of reference of what would hurt more, but I guess that would be it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -25 months ago

          No a dull stick would probably fuck your eye up, a sharp stick will absolutely destroy your eye.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            25 months ago

            That entirely depends on how deep the stick goes into your eye - though at some point it won’t matter anyway.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              25 months ago

              Yes if fired the dull stick out of a fucking cannon it would destroy the eye, how many bits of criteria are we going to add to this (what should be anyway) very straightforward analogy?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                05 months ago

                There are times when a clean cut hurts less than a crude one. We’re not talking about actual damage done, which wasn’t part of the analogy to begin with.