• @sep
    link
    65 months ago

    Everybody would love 2 or 3 more good healthy alternative to even the playing field. Because having the future of fun hang by the tread of a single not-corrupt-to-the-core company is fucking stressfull. But dunking on valve is not the way to a healthy gaming marketplace.

    • @Spedwell
      link
      -55 months ago

      I will continue dunking on Valve as long as they remain the reason good, healthy alternatives can’t exist. I will not re-hash the whole arguments here, please see my other replies in this thread.

      • @sep
        link
        15 months ago

        I have read your arguments, I just fundamentaly disagree. I do not want to lower the ceiling until valve is as crappy as the rest. I want the floor to rise. Basically valve do not stop other companies from competing. Nothing is stopping EGS from including and contributing to proton. allowing and even helping developers to have their games on multiple marketplaces. Building awesome services to provide to developers.

        • @Spedwell
          link
          25 months ago

          Basically valve do not stop other companies from competing

          So is there something you didn’t understand that I can clarify, or are we in agreement that Valve needs to discard the PMFN policy?

          • @sep
            link
            15 months ago

            Is it a shitty businiss practice? Absolutly. Should valve as the only company allow others to under cut them? No that would be insane. Should it be regulated as illegal businiss practices for everyone - yes absolutly.

              • @sep
                link
                25 months ago

                It is basically contractual price fixing. Staggering that the practice is allowed.