• @umfk
    link
    English
    113 days ago

    This is nonsense. There are no loopholes for the Nutriscore. The reason toast has an A is just that carbs are not considered bad in the calculation which I also don’t agree with but it is not a loophole.

    • @Treczoks
      link
      English
      213 days ago

      They add broad bean flour just to get an A, otherwise they would get a C or D. There is no real reason for broad bean flour being present in a loaf of bread, except for faking a better NutriScore.

      • @umfk
        link
        English
        313 days ago

        That probably increases the fiber and/or the protein content, which actually does make the bread healthier. I’m not saying that the formula is perfect and they are changing values around to make it better. But the system is so simple that the only way to game it is to actually make your products better.

        • @Treczoks
          link
          English
          112 days ago

          The problem is that broad bean flour was primarily chosen because it is cheap and overrated. The latter will be corrected in the next set of rules, so there is actually no more reason to add it to plain white toast. So either the companies find another loophole/wrongly rated ingredient, or the plain white will drop from A to C or D where it belongs as a highly processed and not exacly healthy food.

          • @umfk
            link
            English
            1
            edit-2
            12 days ago

            Nutriscore was never meant and never advertised as an absolute measure of healthiness. It was always meant to be used to compare products in the same category. I agree that toast should not have an A but it doesn’t mean that it is healthy, only that it is healthier than bread with a worse rating. I agree that the values in the formula should be updated so that toast has a lower rating than whole wheat bread but that doesn’t mean the Nutriscore is useless.