This you?

“Yes the laptop does not contain communication between Hunter and Joe discussing corrupt deals. It does contain details of Hunter making corrupt deals that Hunter claims Joe was party to.”

Are you agreeing that I never claimed that Joe was implicated by the emails? I just want to make sure you’re not confused again.

I’m not asking you to prove this, I’m asking what the point is of even giving this story attention if Joe isn’t complicit.

I’ll answer your question with a question. Why are you giving this story attention if Joe isn’t complicit?

why you believe there are “good” white supremacists

That is an outright lie I never made that claim. You had ample opportunities to provide the quote but you never did.

your M.O. seems to just be to insult the other person and hyperfixate on the wrong aspect of a discussion while simultaneously being pretty fuckin rude to anyone that doesn’t give you a pass.

Did you ever think it might be because you make false claims about me that I’m rude to you?