The reporter who broke the New York Post's bombshell story on the Hunter Biden laptop speaks out after the legacy media rejected the scandal during the 2020 election.
I’m trying to establish a base line and work from there but you’re so caught up in your little question, thinking you have some gotcha, you can’t respond to anything else.
So here’s the response to your question of why you should care about Hunter, even though your actions show you do.
Caring about something is subjective and with your dishonesty there’s no way to determine if it’s worthy of you caring. Further you caring is not an important metric to determine if a subject can be discussed.
I’m simply being consistent. Sorry if that’s difficult for you to handle.
You disputed my original statement I’m just to verifying you didn’t know what you’re talking about when you disputed it.
More projection, I’m asking you for your reason as to why Hunter is even relevant, not why should I care, I’ll answer yours. I dont have some nonsense gotcha that I’m clutching to.
Replace care with relevant.
Relevance is subjective and with your dishonesty there’s no way to determine if it’s relevant. Further your threshold for relevance is not an important metric to determine if a subject can be discussed.
Better?
Even though you still haven’t answered my question. If Hunter is not relevant then why are you so invested. I’ll answer yours I don’t have some nonsense gotcha.
So why do you care enough to comment here at all?
As I’ve stated before shooting down all your ridiculous claims is entertainment. You make turd time fun.
When have I been dishonest? Please provide examples.
You claimed I stated there were good white supremists. Below is your lie.
You claim there are good white supremacists.
You’ve claimed I was gaslightning you and then in your very next reply claimed you never stated I was making things up. One of those is a lie.
Again, I’m not asking why should I care, but why Hunter is relevant
I don’t know why he’s relevant to you and I don’t care to find out why, I just know he is.
If you didn’t think Hunter was relevant you wouldn’t have asked for sources for his emails. If you didn’t think Hunter was relevant you wouldn’t have disputed those sources. It wasn’t until your 5th reply after sources were provided that you shifted to why is this relevant.
I haven’t once dismissed away anything you’ve provided evidence for
Also you
Hahahaha that article doesn’t have proof of shit.
There’s no reason to lie about things.
I’m simply asking you why you give enough of a shit to follow Hunter at all and discuss him on a Political community
There was an impeachment inquiry into Joe based in part by the content of Hunter’s laptop. Instead of choosing to be ignorant on the matter I followed the proceedings. I responded because I knew my 100% factual statement correcting the liberal narrative would rile up you and your comrades.
I didn’t dismiss your article, I said it had no proof of anything, which it didn’t. You needed to supplement that article with additional evidence to confirm it was accurate, then I stopped mentioning it, didn’t I?
It did, they had emails from Hunters laptop. You weren’t one of those idiots that believed it was a Russian hoax were you? It has been know for quite some time that the emails were authentic.
I know our threads can be hard to follow sometimes but that’s because you keep deflecting and forgetting the topic.
It’s more you bounce to new things after you’re proved wrong.
Yes, because the House can do that. 7 months into this inquiry and nothing has happened because there’s no evidence of wrongdoing.
*No evidence of wrong doing by Joe.
Further don’t speak on this event like you’re an expert you were totally unaware of the details.
So you’re aware proceedings are still going on because they haven’t been able to find any wrongdoing, yeah?
Rember my 1st post when I said Joe hasn’t been implicated… That hasn’t changed with the fact you just learned.
Who’s riled? I’m simply asking for evidence that neither you nor the house have been able to find for 7 months now. I think you’re the riled one, posturing about it like it matters in the face of 7 months of dead ends.
It looks like you forgot or are lieing again (my money is on the latter), I never claimed there was evidence of wrong doing by Joe.
Honestly I’m not even mad. It’s fucking HILARIOUS watching you try to build a case against him because there is none. But you’re incapable of admitting it, just like the Republicans leading the impeachment inquiry. Otherwise you already would’ve. You’re just deep into the sunk cost fallacy rn and flailing.
Please show me where I said there’s evidence of wrong doing by Joe? I guess this is what you’re weasling to now, it’s kind of pathetic that you have to make things up.
I’m trying to establish a base line and work from there but you’re so caught up in your little question, thinking you have some gotcha, you can’t respond to anything else.
So here’s the response to your question of why you should care about Hunter, even though your actions show you do.
Caring about something is subjective and with your dishonesty there’s no way to determine if it’s worthy of you caring. Further you caring is not an important metric to determine if a subject can be discussed.
deleted by creator
You disputed my original statement I’m just to verifying you didn’t know what you’re talking about when you disputed it.
Replace care with relevant.
Relevance is subjective and with your dishonesty there’s no way to determine if it’s relevant. Further your threshold for relevance is not an important metric to determine if a subject can be discussed.
Better?
Even though you still haven’t answered my question. If Hunter is not relevant then why are you so invested. I’ll answer yours I don’t have some nonsense gotcha.
As I’ve stated before shooting down all your ridiculous claims is entertainment. You make turd time fun.
I don’t know why he’s relevant to you and I don’t care to find out why, I just know he is.
If you didn’t think Hunter was relevant you wouldn’t have asked for sources for his emails. If you didn’t think Hunter was relevant you wouldn’t have disputed those sources. It wasn’t until your 5th reply after sources were provided that you shifted to why is this relevant.
deleted by creator
Then why ask for sources showing his wrong doing and dispute those sources?
deleted by creator
Also you
There’s no reason to lie about things.
There was an impeachment inquiry into Joe based in part by the content of Hunter’s laptop. Instead of choosing to be ignorant on the matter I followed the proceedings. I responded because I knew my 100% factual statement correcting the liberal narrative would rile up you and your comrades.
deleted by creator
It did, they had emails from Hunters laptop. You weren’t one of those idiots that believed it was a Russian hoax were you? It has been know for quite some time that the emails were authentic.
It’s more you bounce to new things after you’re proved wrong.
*No evidence of wrong doing by Joe.
Further don’t speak on this event like you’re an expert you were totally unaware of the details.
Rember my 1st post when I said Joe hasn’t been implicated… That hasn’t changed with the fact you just learned.
It looks like you forgot or are lieing again (my money is on the latter), I never claimed there was evidence of wrong doing by Joe.
Please show me where I said there’s evidence of wrong doing by Joe? I guess this is what you’re weasling to now, it’s kind of pathetic that you have to make things up.