• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -116 months ago

    So you are basically agreeing? Not true on paper but in practice you couldn’t just get into college, which is what OP claimed.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      No, I’m disagreeing. You could study anything you wanted, not what the state wanted. It was just hard to get a slot.

      I guess it’s similar to how it’s incredibly hard to get a scholarship at a great university today. You’d hardly say that the modern scholarship system “forces you to study what the state wants”.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        8
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Not as different as recent past in Brazil. Federal and State universities where free and the top of the country, but the slots were few and the competition high. And because class disparities were reinforced on school education, even if the universities were free, only rich and middle income families were able to get in. Since the first Lula’s government, there have been policies in place to ensure that public schools and black students have exclusive slots. Brazillian middle class hate it, but they can eat it. This year was the first time in history that USP (best university in Brazil) had more admission from public schools that for private ones.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          46 months ago

          Yeah, that does sound very comparable to what I was talking about. Your example and mine both do not have the state deciding what university you apply to though, which is what I understood from “the state decides what you’ll study”.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            06 months ago

            The university you apply for has nothing to do with what you’ll study if admissions are politically motivated.