Edit: SOLVED thanks to r00ty !

Hello, I have this weird issue that my Debian 11 will tell me the root folder is full, while I can only find files for half of the accounted space.

df -h reports 56G while the disk analyser (sudo baobab) only finds 28G.

Anyone ever encountered this? I don’t have anything mounted twice… (Not sure what udev is). Also it does not add up to 100%, it should say 7.2G left not 4.1G

df -h /dev/sda* Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on udev 16G 0 16G 0% /dev /dev/sda1 511M 22M 490M 5% /boot/efi /dev/sda2 63G 56G 4.1G 94% / /dev/sda4 852G 386G 423G 48% /home

Edit: my mtab

Edit 2: what Gparted shows

  • @BeatTakeshiOP
    link
    22
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    This! Thank you, this allowed me to find the culprit! It turns out I had an external disk failure some weeks ago, and a cron rsync job was writing in /mnt/thatdrive. When the externaldrive died rsync created a folder /mnt/thatdrive. Now that I replaced the drive, /mnt was disregarded by the disk analyser, but the folder was still there and indeed hidden by the mount… It is just a coincidence that it was half the size of /

    SOLVED!

    du -hs /mnt/rootonly/* 0 /mnt/rootonly/bin 275M /mnt/rootonly/boot 12K /mnt/rootonly/dev 28M /mnt/rootonly/etc 4.0K /mnt/rootonly/home 0 /mnt/rootonly/initrd.img 0 /mnt/rootonly/initrd.img.old 0 /mnt/rootonly/lib 0 /mnt/rootonly/lib32 0 /mnt/rootonly/lib64 0 /mnt/rootonly/libx32 16K /mnt/rootonly/lost+found 24K /mnt/rootonly/media 30G /mnt/rootonly/mnt 773M /mnt/rootonly/opt 4.0K /mnt/rootonly/proc 113M /mnt/rootonly/root 4.0K /mnt/rootonly/run 0 /mnt/rootonly/sbin 4.0K /mnt/rootonly/srv 4.0K /mnt/rootonly/sys 272K /mnt/rootonly/tmp 12G /mnt/rootonly/usr 14G /mnt/rootonly/var 0 /mnt/rootonly/vmlinuz 0 /mnt/rootonly/vmlinuz.old

    • @Archr
      link
      206 months ago

      This might help in the future in case you setup a remote mount for backups in the future. Look into using systemd’s automount feature. If the mount suddenly fails then it will instead create an unwritable directory in its place. This prevents your rsync from erroneously writing data to your root partition instead.

      • @BeatTakeshiOP
        link
        46 months ago

        Thank you for sharing this tip! Very useful indeed

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          6
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          You can also do the following to prevent unwanted writes when something is not mounted at /mnt/thatdrive:

          # make sure it is not mounted, fails if not mounted which is fine
          umount /mnt/thatdrive
          
          # make sure the mountpoint exists
          mkdir -p /mnt/thatdrive
          
          # make the directory immutable, which disallows writing to it (i.e. creating files inside it)
          chattr +i /mnt/thatdrive
          
          # test write to unmounted dir (should fail)
          touch /mnt/thatdrive/myfile
          
          # remount the drive (assumes it’s already listed in fstab)
          mount /mnt/thatdrive
          
          # test write to mounted dir (should succeed)
          touch /mnt/thatdrive/myfile
          
          # cleanup
          rm /mnt/thatdrive/myfile
          

          From man 1 chattr:

          A file with the ‘i’ attribute cannot be modified: it cannot be deleted or renamed, no link can be created to this file, most of the file’s metadata can not be modified, and the file can not be opened in write mode.
          Only the superuser or a process possessing the CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE capability can set or clear this attribute.

          I do this to prevent exactly the situation you’ve encountered. Hope this helps!

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            16 months ago

            I think I would have expected/preferred mount to complain that you’re trying to mount to a directory that’s not empty. I feel like I’ve run into that error before, is that not a thing?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              26 months ago

              It is with zfs, but I not with regular mount I think (at least not by default). It might depend on the filesystem though.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                26 months ago

                Ahh, that might be it. I run TrueNAS too. IMO that should be the default behavior, and you should have to explicitly pass a flag if you want mount to silently mask off part of your filesystem. That seems like almost entirely a tool to shoot yourself in the foot.