• @Saneless
    link
    542 years ago

    Usually there’s still an out of pocket max, like $5000.

    But I guess that could depend on your insurance

    It’s such a scam and the people voting against universal care are the same ones who complain they don’t go to the doctor because it’s too expensive

    • Jee
      link
      fedilink
      162 years ago

      People are voting against universal health care? Do people other than hospital and Pharma owners actually vote against that?

      • @Saneless
        link
        122 years ago

        Well, people who want universal healthcare have a D next to their name. That is enough for 10s of millions of Americans to blindly vote against it

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          Most of those with a D next to their name are fighting just as hard against universal healthcare while collecting campaign donations from pharmaceutical companies anyway. Both parties are rotten servants to the capitalist class

          • @Saneless
            link
            -42 years ago

            No, we’re not going to both parties this discussion.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              22 years ago

              Until one of them starts to actually advocate for these policies i see no point in deluding ourselves into thinking voting blue will make any difference when they literally do not push for universal healthcare

              • @Saneless
                link
                02 years ago

                Well, there’s one party that has made it a point specifically to make things worse for people. They say it out loud. So vote for the other one while it’s still a 2 party system

                Any other mentality is delusional

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        The propaganda is people “like” their private insurance and don’t want to be “forced” to get rid of it. There is also an anti-tax streak that has existed since the 1700s (no taxation without representation, Boston tea party, etc) that lives on strongest in reactionary politics.

        Edit: Oh and last time we tried to actually improve healthcare they scare mongered the public that there would be “government death panels” who decided whether you would get coverage. As opposed to the current reality where the death panels are real and run by private corporations.

        • @crusa187
          link
          62 years ago

          This is the tragic half-truth espoused by the corporate media claiming there are two sides to this issue.

          Every time, they fail to complete the statement: “…give up private, but Medicare coverage will be better

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            32 years ago

            I don’t understand why getting rid of private insurance keeps being brought up. Afaik none of the proposed laws would remove it. The point should be that the universal healthcare is good enough you don’t need private insurance.

            In Canada there is provincial healthcare that everyone gets for free, and many people still have supplemental insurance (private or employer provided) to expand coverage for things like prescriptions, eye, and dental.

            • @crusa187
              link
              22 years ago

              That’s such a great point. It’s not like single payer would close down private insurance companies. The truth is they would just become redundant and people would realize they’re not needed, then choose to stop wasting their money on them…unless they can pivot their business to provide additional and desirable service beyond what people get from universal coverage.

    • queermunist she/her
      link
      fedilink
      52 years ago

      Most of the people voting against universal healthcare are comfortably middle class and want to protect their ~premium coverage~ or they’re on Medicare. Few people struggling to afford healthcare even vote lol

      • @Saneless
        link
        32 years ago

        And tons and tons are poor in red srates

        • queermunist she/her
          link
          fedilink
          02 years ago

          No, most of the poor in red states don’t vote. That’s universally true across the country - there’s a small minority that do, but they’re not the ones stopping universal healthcare. It’s business owners, landlords, wealthy blue collar workers, farmers, and retirees.

          This myth that the poor vote for their own oppression is something made up to make you hate poor people.

          • @Saneless
            link
            32 years ago

            Ok then, I would love to see your information so I can understand it

            • queermunist she/her
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              So on universal healthcare I’m not sure, but based on party preference and voter participation it looks like right-wing poor people are a minority. There’s a linear relationship between voting and income and there’s a clear party preference based on income as well.

              Poor people usually don’t vote, and when they do they usually don’t vote to the Right. I guess I’m just assuming that translates into things like universal healthcare. I need to go to work so I’m out of time to find out for sure though lol

              • @MelonTheMan
                link
                42 years ago

                Thanks for sharing this, I really hadn’t considered it. I’ve never heard/seen this before but it makes a ton of sense, wish it were more visible.

              • @Saneless
                link
                32 years ago

                I’m check it out, thanks

    • Bakkoda
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      I have a buddy who has his own dental practice. Incredibly smart, motivated individual. Hates the thought of universal healthcare. Also hates not getting paid. I just don’t discuss it with him lol

      • @Saneless
        link
        72 years ago

        I wonder how many don’t go to the dentist because of poor or no insurance. He’d have more patients for sure

        • Bakkoda
          link
          fedilink
          5
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          He would also be guaranteed payment. I just don’t understand him. He does a ton of free work for people because he’s truly a great guy. He would get paid for that work. Maybe he thinks he would make less money?

          • @MelonTheMan
            link
            42 years ago

            He’d probably have to work on more patients, since demand would surely shoot up.