• Sabata
    link
    fedilink
    33 months ago

    I like OPs version better and chose to evolve the language that way.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      73 months ago

      If only a very small handful of people make the same mistake, it doesn’t evolve the language, it’s just a mistake, plain and simple.

      I know you’re just trying to make yourself feel a wee bit morally superior by saying that, but it’s the complete opposite of how language evolution works

      • Sabata
        link
        fedilink
        -43 months ago

        It’s not a mistake if I can understand the message.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23 months ago

          People have varying degrees of ability to understand outside of what they know, what is “good enough” for you might be incomprehensible to someone else.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      43 months ago

      Yeah; as a native and fairly well-educated speaker, I’m fucked if I can form the past participles of some of our verbs

      If I swim across a river, is it now the swimmed river? Swum river? Swam river?

      If I sneak into a room, have I sneaked? Snuck? Both sound wrong.

      Didn’t find anything ambiguous about ‘costed’, it works for me.

      • @mPony
        link
        43 months ago

        so if I understand correctly, the past participle of drag is… cabaret?

      • @Censored
        link
        43 months ago

        If you swim across a river, it is now a river you’ve swum. If you sneak into a room, you have snuck in.

        Those are correct but they look and sound wrong.

      • palordrolap
        link
        fedilink
        13 months ago

        Would some variant of “snauk(t)” or “snaught” work for you? Your brain might be expecting ablaut in the style of “teach” / “taught” or “catch” / “caught” rather than that of “sing” / “sung”.

        How do you feel about “(p)reached”? “Snaked”?

        A fun fact about “caught” is that it’s a relative neologism. It uh, caught on after people decided they didn’t like “catched” for whatever reason. (I guess it has something to do with tangibility / concreteness. Most other -atch words are used for objects.)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 months ago

      I prefer cost, not sure why but it just feels more natural and easier for me to say. But I am not a native speaker if it means anything.