• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    25
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    There’s a bunch of old texts about a Jewish “prophet” called Jesus, who was gathering some followers. As far as I understand, there’s no really reason not to believe the person existed.

    Then again, all the Jesus lore, there’s no reason to believe his miracles were real as those made no sense and there’s no real proof besides those same texts written after Jesse’s death

    • @Apepollo11
      link
      206 months ago

      This. There is evidence that a preacher called Jesus existed, was crucified, and was well-regarded enough to start a following that persisted even after his death.

      There isn’t, however, strong historical evidence for any of the magical parts of it.

        • @almar_quigley
          link
          36 months ago

          Every Christian takes an historical proof of Jesus as affirmation of the stories within the New Testament.

          • @Apepollo11
            link
            16 months ago

            Let’s not do the ‘every Christian’ thing. It’s worth remembering the US has a very ‘unique’ type of Christian.

      • @uienia
        link
        06 months ago

        There are zero contemporary primary sources for his existence.

        • @Apepollo11
          link
          16 months ago

          Primary sources? No, but there are independent secondary sources by people with no skin in the game.

          Antiquities of the Jews by Josephus (circa 93–94 CE).

          Annals by Tacitus (circa 116 CE)

          The earliest Christian writings are also more about the teachings of a disruptive Jewish preacher who was then crucified, than they are about magic.

      • Caveman
        link
        06 months ago

        I remember that one miracle closely resembles CPR. He put his hands on a body and brought it back to life.