There’s no such thing as a right to a life without suffering. Needless suffering, maybe, but we all suffer in some form or another at some point in our lives.
How can you have the right to something that doesn’t exist? Your right to life is the right to have an unnatural death investigated by the police. That is all.
OP is right though. It’s hard to make a salient point when your opening statement is nonsensical
Elaborate
There’s no such thing as a right to a life without suffering. Needless suffering, maybe, but we all suffer in some form or another at some point in our lives.
You’re conflating the ability to live without suffering with the right to live without suffering. Figure out the difference and then proceed.
Unless you’re one of those religious cult weirdos who thinks we “deserve suffering” because of some angry sky wizard.
How can you have the right to something that doesn’t exist? Your right to life is the right to have an unnatural death investigated by the police. That is all.
Here we encounter the common conservative trope, “I don’t understand, therefore no.”
Technically correct. Still missing the point.