@return2ozma to United States | News & [email protected] • 5 months agoWill the Debate This Week Be ‘Rah-Rah’ or ‘Ruh-Roh?’www.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square12arrow-up126arrow-down13file-text
arrow-up123arrow-down1external-linkWill the Debate This Week Be ‘Rah-Rah’ or ‘Ruh-Roh?’www.nytimes.com@return2ozma to United States | News & [email protected] • 5 months agomessage-square12file-text
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish7•edit-25 months agoOr “ho hum.” Who doesn’t know the candidates yet and thinks they’ll learn anything about them?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•5 months agoIf it even happens. Trump is looking for every reason to not attend.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink0•5 months agoI, for one, haven’t seen a few of the US candidates at a debate.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•5 months agoThere are two candidates. No, the others are not viable. Yes I know that’s unfair. Yes voting for them is basically not voting and potentially helps another candidate you “hate more” to win instead.
Or “ho hum.”
Who doesn’t know the candidates yet and thinks they’ll learn anything about them?
If it even happens. Trump is looking for every reason to not attend.
I, for one, haven’t seen a few of the US candidates at a debate.
There are two candidates. No, the others are not viable. Yes I know that’s unfair. Yes voting for them is basically not voting and potentially helps another candidate you “hate more” to win instead.
There are more than 2 candidates.
Good luck with that.