• @QuantumStorm
    link
    318 months ago

    He’s a morally reprehensible asshole either way.

    • @Aurix
      link
      -348 months ago

      Removed by mod

      • @Aurix
        link
        88 months ago

        Removed by mod

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          118 months ago

          Have you talked to 17 year olds? They are far from developed in most cases. Anyone even in their late 20s should notice the difference in development and stay clear.

        • Carighan Maconar
          link
          18 months ago

          Yeah that’s a fair take.

          It is reprehensible and disgusting behavior, but it doesn’t mean we should universally apply labels across vast swaths of different issues, as it devalues said label and poisons future discussion.

          Simple labels simplify discussion of course, but that runs the risk of losing nuance for the specific way someone was a disgusting creep.

          • Dr. Jenkem
            link
            fedilink
            English
            58 months ago

            No it’s not. Beahm, a 38 year old man at the time, was sexting a minor. That makes him a pedo.

            • Carighan Maconar
              link
              -28 months ago

              I did not disagree with that, so I’m not sure what you’re on about.

              • Dr. Jenkem
                link
                fedilink
                English
                08 months ago

                So you agree that Beahm is a pedo? You replied to a person that does not think he is a pedo with “fair take”. Maybe you replied to the wrong person.

                • Carighan Maconar
                  link
                  -38 months ago

                  Yeah I do. I disagree with most of their posts, but I agree with the motion that using the same labels indiscriminately is a problem in online discourse.

                  For example, far as I know so far, I’d call him a pedo, but I am unsure whether I’d call him a predator (of course, language differences apply, too). That’s just because I need words to express the predatory nature of people like Maxwell who prey on teens and YA.

                  That’s kinda what I meant, there’s too few words to just use the same label across the board sometimes. Doesn’t make something someone does less reprehensible. Rather i prefer to sometimes use full sentences instead of quick labels because it more accurately expresses the matter.

                  • Dr. Jenkem
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    38 months ago

                    but I am unsure whether I’d call him a predator (of course, language differences apply, too). That’s just because I need words to express the predatory nature of people like Maxwell who prey on teens and YA.

                    What do you mean by this? Beahm was preying on a minor by sexting that minor and asking to meetup at twitch con. Are you specifically referring to people operating child sex rings? In either case, I don’t think anyone else uses your ultra-specific definition. For myself, and I assume most others, pedophiles are merely a type of predator. For example, the show, to catch a predator, was about creeps sexting kids online. This is precisely what Beahm was doing so I don’t think it’s unreasonable to call him a predator.

        • @Aurix
          link
          -158 months ago

          Removed by mod