• @someacnt_
    link
    10
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I expect debates, hm Interesting this got this much upvotes

    But also why no one talked about land usage

      • @someacnt_
        link
        54 days ago

        I mean, the single biggest issue with solar is its land usage. Wind is much better with this.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          54 days ago

          Plus the batteries. Batteries are expensive and we need way more that can store more and charge/discharge at faster rates.

          • @someacnt_
            link
            34 days ago

            Imo batteries are like this since battery companies are quite greedy. They want some big cut out of the cost.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              24 days ago

              What you think you can just reply to me with reasonable statements I can’t disagree with? How dare you!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      64 days ago

      No one talks about land usage for solar either. Which is a real shame, because with some relatively minor redesigns solar plants can be integrated into the ecosystem without causing massive damage, instead of what usually happens which is just clear-cutting a huge field and destroying any plant and animal life there.

      • @Hikermick
        link
        24 days ago

        Nuclear plants also have to built adjacent to reliable water supply. I’ll bet the land is more expensive and a bigger environmental impact whereas the location for solar is more flexible

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      34 days ago

      The USA specifically has so much useless land with minimal ecological value, that if an energy project could actually be done at a federal level we could probably not have to worry about it.

      There is a whole bunch of land in central USA that is not especially unique or teaming with life, slap down a big renewable energy farm.