• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      95 months ago

      Yeah, they did.

      Their hypothesis was that men who were dissatisfied with the size of their penises were more likely to own guns. The opposite ended up being the case.

      • @psmgx
        link
        English
        25 months ago

        In other words, guns work

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15 months ago

        i didn’t read it, but what was the methodology? did they do a survey of dudes who own 50 guns and ask “do you think your penis is big enough?” and did they expect those dudes in particular to be honest?

        doubt

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          45 months ago

          Boy, if only there was a way you could get that information. Wouldn’t it be convenient if there was a link to the paper’s abstract so you wouldn’t have to talk out of your ass?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -1
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            i have to read scholarly crap at work. not doing it on my own time. especially for things i don’t give that much of a rat’s ass about

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                0
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                lol i was asking a question, not making claims.

                i’ll comment all i feel like, and you’ll do nothing. except apparently whine about it

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  15 months ago

                  I didn’t know it was possible to say “I’m a jackass” without saying “I’m a jackass”. TIL.

        • @Etterra
          link
          English
          25 months ago

          Self reported data is always suspect. What was their margin of error?