One House Democrat said he spoke for others in the wake of the president’s stunningly feeble debate performance on Thursday: “The movement to convince Biden to not run is real.”

The House member, an outspoken defender of the president, said that House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer should consider “a combined effort” to nudge President Joe Biden out of the race.

Crestfallen by the president’s weak voice, pallid appearance and meandering answers, numerous Democratic officials said Biden’s bet on an early debate to rebut unceasing questions about his age had not only backfired but done damage that may prove irreversible. The president had, in the first 30 minutes of the debate, fully affirmed doubts about his fitness.

A second House Democrat said “reflection is needed” from Biden about the way ahead and indicated the private text threads among lawmakers were even more dire, with some saying outright that the president needed to drop out of the race.

    • Xyre
      link
      fedilink
      English
      406 months ago

      A bland and unprincipled candidate whose positions shift based on polling numbers. Not to mention her prosecutorial background and close proximity to SF corruption scandals makes her an easy target.

    • @ganksy
      link
      226 months ago

      She’s not worse than Biden but not great. He should have chosen Stacey Abrams.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        116 months ago

        Her history as a prosecutor in California makes her significantly worse. She’s personally locked up a lot of POC for drug possession.

      • _haha_oh_wow_
        link
        fedilink
        English
        66 months ago

        She seems vague and even incoherent a lot of the time, I’m not so sure she’s better.

      • Xyre
        link
        fedilink
        English
        46 months ago

        I think Tammy Duckworth would’ve been a good choice.

        • @ganksy
          link
          56 months ago

          She would have been such a great choice. Completely unassailable from all sides and sharp as a tack.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        46 months ago

        Why do people just go on the internet and tell lies like this? California elected her attorney general for 8 years and senator once.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          116 months ago

          They might be talking about her primary run for President specifically, but she had dropped out way before then I’m pretty sure. That is, I am not sure if California even had a chance to vote for her. It’s one of the parts that suck about US primaries and being in a late state. Sometimes you don’t even get a chance to vote for the person you wanted to vote for before they drop out.

        • @grue
          link
          English
          206 months ago

          Her background is as a “tough on crime” (read: shitty on civil rights) prosecuting attorney.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          16 months ago

          She was incredibly unpopular when she ran in the primary. Her campaign failed well before Biden was the heir apparent.

    • @hightrix
      link
      176 months ago

      Running Kamala would be making the same mistake they made back in 2016. She is polarizing, and extremely unlikeable. Anyone that worked with her or her department when she was in law in CA has nothing but bad things to say about her.

      Running Kamala would be giving Trump a second term.

    • JJROKCZ
      link
      66 months ago

      She’s not white and female, those reasons alone mean she’s lost over a quarter of the nation.

      • @Death_Equity
        link
        16 months ago

        That portion of the country wouldn’t vote for any Democrat anyways.