@Varven to People [email protected] • 6 months agoPls someone make this realityimagemessage-square254arrow-up11.74Karrow-down132
arrow-up11.71Karrow-down1imagePls someone make this reality@Varven to People [email protected] • 6 months agomessage-square254
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish9•edit-26 months ago Because it’s a prejudicial term, not because the past isn’t fucking shitty. If that were true then what do you call the classical age? The darker ages?
minus-square@PugJesuslinkEnglish9•6 months agoWe generally say ‘Antiquity’ and ‘Late Antiquity’ anymore.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish10•edit-26 months agoOoh present-tense anymore! Really don’t see that very often, but it’s got a nice ring to it Edit: it’s a positive anymore not present-tense. Thank you @[email protected]!
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•edit-26 months agoCan you explain please ? I don’t understand their sentence as it is. What’s surprising to me isn’t the present tense, it’s the fact that it isn’t negative.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink7•6 months agoIt sounds odd to me too, but I found a wiki article on it: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positive_anymore
If that were true then what do you call the classical age? The darker ages?
We generally say ‘Antiquity’ and ‘Late Antiquity’ anymore.
Ooh present-tense anymore! Really don’t see that very often, but it’s got a nice ring to it
Edit: it’s a positive anymore not present-tense. Thank you @[email protected]!
Can you explain please ? I don’t understand their sentence as it is. What’s surprising to me isn’t the present tense, it’s the fact that it isn’t negative.
It sounds odd to me too, but I found a wiki article on it: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positive_anymore
Thanks, TIL I learned