• @jaybone
    link
    123 months ago

    This has now gone to: sharing baby pictures is a privacy violation because the baby can’t give consent.

    Lot of very special people in this thread on Lemmy today.

    • [email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I haven’t been able to peg Lemmy down even after a year and this thread hasn’t helped. Lemmy is pro-freedom, acceptance, and FOSS, is literal to the point of absurdity, has a selectively activated superiority complex, and averages ~17 years old. Knowing all of that, I’m still endlessly befuddled. Any chance you’ve got the last puzzle piece?

      • @MutilationWave
        link
        93 months ago

        Lemmy skews way older. Like 30+ average I’d say.

        • [email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          13 months ago

          There are many users over 30 but they are the minority. The clear absence of memory beyond what I’d personally describe as recent is pretty telling. I really have nothing tangible to back the assertion but it’s fairly apparent to me as a person of an age.

      • @jaybone
        link
        63 months ago

        this particular thread seems to have brought out a real strange bunch today.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        53 months ago

        It’s a majority (or close to) 40yr old tech autists. I’m not trying to be funny, I’m not trying to be offensive, that’s just a statement of fact.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      03 months ago

      sharing naked with their genitals exposed baby pictures is a privacy violation

      Lot of very special people in this thread on Lemmy today.

      Yes, yes there are.