The Supreme Court on Friday made it harder to charge Capitol riot defendants with obstruction, a charge that also has been brought against former President Donald Trump.

The justices ruled 6-3 that the charge of obstructing an official proceeding, enacted in 2002 in response to the financial scandal that brought down Enron Corp., must include proof that defendants tried to tamper with or destroy documents. Only some of the people who violently attacked the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, fall into that category.

The decision could be used as fodder for claims by Trump and his Republican allies that the Justice Department has treated the Capitol riot defendants unfairly.

It’s unclear how the court’s decision will affect the case against Trump in Washington, although special counsel Jack Smith has said the charges faced by the former president would not be affected.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    35 months ago

    Yes. Public property doesn’t mean free access at all times. Even public parks are often closed at night.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      05 months ago

      And when do the public get this free access to congress?

        • Flying Squid
          link
          -35 months ago

          So it is a public space where it is always trespassing?

            • Flying Squid
              link
              -45 months ago

              Our taxes pay for it. It’s government land. How is it not a public space?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                55 months ago

                Because not all public land (meaning government-owned) is a public space (meaning available for use to the general public, like a park or community room at the library).

                Our taxes pay for military bases too. Those are also government land. I’m sure you wouldn’t try wandering in there for a nice walk or a picnic.