• @barsquid
    link
    317 months ago

    Are we talking about N95s? Oh, hang on, I recognize this username, we’re talking about whatever delusions you’re having today.

    The weirdest thing about masks is how easy it was to brainwash the “muh freedoms” crowd against covering their faces just by having a clown in orange facepaint say masks are effeminate. Hope you all enjoy having your entries in everyone’s facial recognition database.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -497 months ago

      I am actually just going with “muh science” and “muh statistics” on this one… But if all you guys pretend that masks and lockdowns worked then maybe it will become true!

      • @barsquid
        link
        277 months ago

        Sure. Browsing YouTube until you find someone who shares your delusions isn’t “science.”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -407 months ago

          I actually used the government data, but sure, you can believe whatever youtube science you want.

          • @barsquid
            link
            157 months ago

            Nah. Let’s read papers from actual scientists. You know, instead of having you look at VAERS and hallucinate conclusions that match your preexisting biases.

          • @Duamerthrax
            link
            127 months ago

            Having raw data is only useful if you’re literate.

              • @irreticent
                link
                37 months ago

                You remind me of the election deniers that claim to have mountains of evidence but absolutely refuse to share that evidence.

          • @LotrOrc
            link
            117 months ago

            Can you show your source then?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        147 months ago

        Consider using the stats proved by the rest of the world. It’s got an amazing sample set.