@[email protected]M to Murdered by [email protected] • 7 months agogotdamnfedia.ioimagemessage-square31fedilinkarrow-up1592arrow-down122file-textcross-posted to: lemmyshitpost
arrow-up1570arrow-down1imagegotdamnfedia.io@[email protected]M to Murdered by [email protected] • 7 months agomessage-square31fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: lemmyshitpost
minus-square@Droggelbecherlink13•7 months agoI wouldn’t say so, and for the same reason they claim water isnt wet i claim water is wet: unless it’s just a single molecule, water touches (and even clings to) water. So water is wet.
minus-square@AkarethlinkEnglish1•7 months ago What if you have two molecules of H2O that are below 0°C or above 100°C? What if you have two molecules of some other liquid substance that are also polar like H2O?
minus-square@Droggelbecherlink3•7 months agoI’d say that the liquid phase is implied. Nobody is arguing whether a solid is wet. And this is just by feel, but I’d say yes. Wetness is polar liquids sticking to stuff.
I wouldn’t say so, and for the same reason they claim water isnt wet i claim water is wet: unless it’s just a single molecule, water touches (and even clings to) water. So water is wet.
I’d say that the liquid phase is implied. Nobody is arguing whether a solid is wet.
And this is just by feel, but I’d say yes. Wetness is polar liquids sticking to stuff.