Type 1 [Missouri]M to United States | News & [email protected]English • 6 months agoUS Supreme Court rules Trump has immunity for official, not private actswww.reuters.commessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up192arrow-down13file-textcross-posted to: politicsnews
arrow-up189arrow-down1external-linkUS Supreme Court rules Trump has immunity for official, not private actswww.reuters.comType 1 [Missouri]M to United States | News & [email protected]English • 6 months agomessage-square10fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: politicsnews
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish36•6 months agoHe can be charged for private acts, but as long as he used official communication to discuss it with others that can’t be used as evidence. Then the stacked courts get to decide what is official and private, so private is effectively immune as well. What a fucking shitshow.
minus-square@Beetschnappslink1•edit-26 months agoAnything that can be used to show anything is an official act. There is no difference. There never will be. Everything is official and anyone can be killed to prove it such, officially. Immunity doesn’t need to be proven, it exists and it’s up to you to prove otherwise. Fuck off until proven otherwise. It’s not a bad thing. Unless you can officially prove it. So fuck you, you piece of shit; until you can prove it.
He can be charged for private acts, but as long as he used official communication to discuss it with others that can’t be used as evidence. Then the stacked courts get to decide what is official and private, so private is effectively immune as well.
What a fucking shitshow.
Anything that can be used to show anything is an official act.
There is no difference. There never will be. Everything is official and anyone can be killed to prove it such, officially.
Immunity doesn’t need to be proven, it exists and it’s up to you to prove otherwise. Fuck off until proven otherwise.
It’s not a bad thing. Unless you can officially prove it. So fuck you, you piece of shit; until you can prove it.