• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -16 months ago

    Naked photos of children is pretty much the definition of CP, yes.

    A parent is unlikely to face prosecution unless they share the photos, but that doesn’t mean it’s legal.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -36 months ago

        See, this is on par with arguing semantics around how it’s not pedophilia because the victim wasn’t prepubescent. You may be technically right, but the fact that you’re making the argument is gross.

        • @Dasus
          link
          55 months ago

          It’s really not.

          It’s not porn, because it’s not porn.

          It’s not our fault that you think of everything as sexual.

          There is nothing sexual about a naked body. If you ever can, do come visit Finland. By your logic, anyone visiting a sauna with someone else there is either committing or being the victim of a sex crime? (You’re not allowed to wear a bathing suit in the sauna for health reasons.)

            • @Dasus
              link
              35 months ago

              Because of a right to privacy, sure. But I’ve actually had a camera in my local swimming hall and in the sauna while I was in there. A shielded gopro which wasn’t on, obviously, but it could’ve been, and no-one batted an eye. I had permission from the staff, we were doing a bit of underwater filming.

              Anyway, do you think infants have the right to privacy from their caregivers, even when they’re not even self-reliant?

        • Flying Squid
          link
          16 months ago

          And yet you claimed I have child porn and that I am abusing my child.

          When are you going to contact lemmy.world admin to have me reported to the authorities for child abuse and the possession of child pornography?