@[email protected] to [email protected] • 3 months agoWe regret to inform you that Ray Kurzweil is back on his bullshitwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square354fedilinkarrow-up174arrow-down10
arrow-up174arrow-down1external-linkWe regret to inform you that Ray Kurzweil is back on his bullshitwww.theguardian.com@[email protected] to [email protected] • 3 months agomessage-square354fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-23 months agoYou’re going to blind someone with all of your projection.
minus-square@Blue_MorpholinkEnglish1•3 months agoSo you agree that Kurzweil’s 1999 prediction that by 2009 most consumer to business transactions would be with a virtual assistant that includes a realist human head was wrong.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•3 months agoYou’re misquoting the prediction to change parameters again. This part: “Most routine business transactions (purchases, travel, reservations) take place between a human and a virtual personality.” is obviously correct. “Often, the virtual presentation includes an animated visual presence that looks like a human face” I guess this would also be correct, unless you are misinterpreting “often” to mean “most”.
You’re going to blind someone with all of your projection.
That’s not a rebuttal.
Fail.
Wrong. Pass.
Still not a rebuttal.
Incorrect
Incorrect
Yes, that’s what I said…
So you agree that Kurzweil’s 1999 prediction that by 2009 most consumer to business transactions would be with a virtual assistant that includes a realist human head was wrong.
You’re misquoting the prediction to change parameters again.
This part:
is obviously correct.
“Often, the virtual presentation includes an animated visual presence that looks like a human face”
I guess this would also be correct, unless you are misinterpreting “often” to mean “most”.