• @Blue_Morpho
    link
    English
    15 months ago

    That’s not a rebuttal.

    Fail.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15 months ago

      I don’t think I need to rebut at this point. You’ve been destroyed on almost every single point with one internet search outside of Apple.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          15 months ago

          No, I’m sure you’ll find one eventually.

          Won’t really tip the overwhelming correct predictions kurzweil has, but why don’t you try again?

          • @Blue_Morpho
            link
            English
            15 months ago

            I didn’t make the assertion.

            Fail.

              • @Blue_Morpho
                link
                English
                15 months ago

                You asserted there was self driving road sensors technology installed by 2009.

                It’s not my role to prove your mistakes.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  15 months ago

                  That is definitely your self-imposed role.

                  You dramatically narrowed the context of my original comment in the hope you could find technical faults within it.

                  Your plaintive cries backfired magnificently, but why else would you keep trying so hard to misinterpret my original assertion and establish new guidelines if you didn’t think that refuting kurzweils majority-correct predictions was your role?

                  If you aren’t trying to find some way to refute kurzweil predictions, I have no idea what you’re doing.

                  Now I’m very curious to find out why you think you’re vainly banging your head against this wall you built.

                  • @Blue_Morpho
                    link
                    English
                    15 months ago

                    In 1999 Kurzweil made predictions for 2009. I didn’t make the predictions.

                    Many of the predictions did not come true. Kurzweil’s 86% claim is false. Even you being a fan have agreed that 86% is wrong.

                    Non fans, which is how you need to approach things scientifically, claim 25%. Not being a fan doesn’t mean you aren’t being objective. I have already said Kurzweil’s earlier work was very accurate which is why he became famous.