If inciting an insurrection towards their own government is an action without legal repercussions, I don’t see how the law would be less lenient about straight up firing a gun at an opponent.

I by no means want any party to resolve to violent tactics. So even though I play with the thought, I really don’t want anything like it to happen. I am just curious if it’s actually the case that a sitting president has now effectively a licence to kill.

What am I missing?

  • @Veneroso
    link
    136 months ago

    You just need to pull the “it was in the best interest of the United States” card and it’s an official act.

    • @xenoclast
      link
      46 months ago

      Well then why hasn’t he done it… I can’t think of something of a more positive interest than to dump trump down a hole.

      • @problematicPanther
        link
        76 months ago

        because biden (and the democratic party in general) are a bunch of cowards who think that they will prevail simply by taking the high road. Fascism was never defeated by strongly worded speeches or political actions, it always took blood.

        • @xenoclast
          link
          16 months ago

          You are right. They really live in a fantasy land.

    • @IphtashuFitz
      link
      English
      26 months ago

      It’s not currently in the best interest.

      IF Trump wins the election then it would be in the best interests of the US. It would be akin to a judge throwing out a juries verdict because the jury clearly made the wrong decision.