Google, which has an ambitious plan to address climate change with cleaner operations, came nowhere close to its goals last year, according to the company’s annual Environmental Report Tuesday.
Yep clearly it’s over my head, brah. The only point I’m making is that I no longer rely on Google for certain information. The reason being is that I’d have to go through 10 pages of reading online forum posts to find a solution to a problem. Where as with AI, it takes all the available information and provides me either 1 solution or multiple solutions all within one shot. Sometimes the information it provides is incorrect and more than likely it just has to do with how I’m phrasing the question. When I rephrase the question, then it provides the answer I’m looking for.
So do I spend 1 hour reading through posts from different online forum boards to find my answer, or do I spend 1 minute, hell even 10 minutes, asking a question and having a summary of answer(s) provided to me?
Call me an idiot if it makes you feel better, but I’m getting the results I require and saving time.
it’s funny how you say “it provides correct answers”, dump six paragraphs of half-baked, malformatted instructions (that, if followed, spawn an endless stream of non-terminating powershell processes), then ten minutes later admit in a different comment that “sometimes the information it provides is incorrect”
Yeah, sometimes I have to rephrase my question. I admitted that. That’s how AI works. And those instructions worked exactly how it should for our needs.
Because… AI is able to find answers to my questions faster than Google can? wat. Time is precious, ain’t got time fo dat.
When time is precious, use AI for all your glue in pizza queries.
Of course, Google is also crapified, but at least there is still a search engine underneath.
Removed by mod
you are way, way too short for this ride
Yep clearly it’s over my head, brah. The only point I’m making is that I no longer rely on Google for certain information. The reason being is that I’d have to go through 10 pages of reading online forum posts to find a solution to a problem. Where as with AI, it takes all the available information and provides me either 1 solution or multiple solutions all within one shot. Sometimes the information it provides is incorrect and more than likely it just has to do with how I’m phrasing the question. When I rephrase the question, then it provides the answer I’m looking for.
So do I spend 1 hour reading through posts from different online forum boards to find my answer, or do I spend 1 minute, hell even 10 minutes, asking a question and having a summary of answer(s) provided to me?
Call me an idiot if it makes you feel better, but I’m getting the results I require and saving time.
typically one prefers their questions be answered correctly. but hey, you are free to be wrong faster now
Removed by mod
it’s funny how you say “it provides correct answers”, dump six paragraphs of half-baked, malformatted instructions (that, if followed, spawn an endless stream of non-terminating powershell processes), then ten minutes later admit in a different comment that “sometimes the information it provides is incorrect”
wait no funny isn’t the correct word is it
bloody amazing to see them airdrop in pitching perplexity when literally last week perplexity was caught pants down stealing
llm systems so good they still need human reputation-washers!
Yeah, sometimes I have to rephrase my question. I admitted that. That’s how AI works. And those instructions worked exactly how it should for our needs.
So is this community anti-AI?
holy fuck shut up, nobody fucking asked
LMAO the hostility is wild. Is this community just entirely anti-AI? Is that what I’m missing?
Yeah, I don’t get it. I think they’re referring to the hallucination problem. If it works for you and your needs, godspeed.