Old habits die hard, but there’s Reddiquette which needs to be revived, and some which needs to die.

Many “golden-age” redditors remember a time when downvoting was reserved for hostility, not a different opinion. For the sake of our growing community I would like to implore everyone to be awesome to each other.

However, this place is not Reddit.

  • We don’t measure in bananas here.
  • We don’t need to append “edit: typo” to edited posts and comments.
  • if you see something which is worthy of a downvote: down vote and move on! Don’t engage with it and feed the algorithm/engament machine so other people are exposed to it when sorting by active.
  • @ZozanoOP
    link
    5
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This argument never really made sense to me. Anyone who is being deceptive is not going to tell people they’re editing their comments.

    It’s the result of nothing more than a moral panic. There aren’t roving bands of keyboard warriors rolling around making comments and then editing them to make others look stupid.

    And even if there were, they could just include “edit: typo” and get away with it. Unless someone takes screenshots.

    I think it says more about the community that everyone is expected to prove their innocence. Let’s have a little faith in each other, we’re better than that.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I get it as a cultural thing, but it makes no sense epistemologically.

        An unethical person would not state they changed their comment, and a malicious person would state their edit was mundane. Those two factors alone render the practice of proving your innocence in advance moot.

        I think it’s sad that people reflexively assume the worst. I used to engage in some heated debates on Reddit, but I was never accused of, or assumed the other person edited their posts to make me look bad. It seems like paranoid behaviour to me.

        Strangely enough, if it became the norm to correct typos without stating it, the default assumption would be that the edit was a typo correction.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            As I just replied to another user, paraphrasing this: downvotes might be perceived as the community self-policing, but if you visit r/vegan you’ll see how that can make a community hostile. I’m a vegan and I can’t fucking stand that place. If you have an alternative opinion, prepare to wind up on the top of controversial, where the mob has a field day.

            I think some sub’s had the right idea by limiting the lower voting karma to 0. Another downside is it essentially paints a target for the community before an individual has formed an opinion. It generate the hive mind we should be avoiding.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                21 year ago

                I got nothing more to say, you hit the nail on the head.

                It reminds me of grading movies. If someone says to me its an 8/10, that is useless information. If they tell me it has some action, I’m intruged. Then they tell me it’s a Marvel movie, and I lose all interest.

                However, I will say that it was entertaining as fuck to see /u/spez’s comment karma tank - but he’s not really a member of the reddit community, just the warden hearing the prisoners shout “fuck you!” before starting a riot and a partial breakout.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    21 year ago

                    Its a much better discussion than the one I’m having elsewhere, that’s for sure. I sure do love being strawmanned. I was hoping it would be more than a week before I encountered this lol.