• Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin
    link
    fedilink
    8
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    This is actually the big wrench in just making them all states, some of the locals think the representation is worth missing out on to continue not needing to pay federal taxes.

    In puerto rico this is especially pronounced since that’s the territory most likely to achieve statehood in the near future considering how small the populations of all the other ones are. Even doing something extraordinary like giving out a representative for every 50k people would leave some of these places with only one rep in Congress while states like NY and California are fielding delegations of hundreds each.

    I would think that the likely future of these territories are as Freely Associated States, basically independent defacto but with special benefits in exchange for staying under US military protection.

    • @MutilationWave
      link
      66 months ago

      If Puerto Rico or DC achieve state status then Republicans lose Senate majority forever. If they both do, Republicans are totally fucked. Expect continued discourse of both sides disagree we can’t do this etc.

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin
        link
        fedilink
        76 months ago

        I wouldn’t be so sure. DC yes absolutely I frankly don’t understand how the folks in that city haven’t mutinied yet with how viciously they hate the Republicans. Puerto Rico on the other hand does not have a clean Dem/Rep split, and it’d take a while for Puerto Rico’s local political parties to meld with the current system, and they could opportunistically choose to align with the Republicans if they thought they could get something out of it.

    • @dariusj18
      link
      26 months ago

      Also, for PR and USVI they would lose their Rum taxes. As island economies they are pretty limited, so they’d need to rely mostly on tourism to replace those dollars, however it’s not like they can get much more than they already do.