@return2ozma to News • 3 days agoDonald Trump's chances of winning New Jersey are growingwww.newsweek.comexternal-linkmessage-square16arrow-up171arrow-down129
arrow-up142arrow-down1external-linkDonald Trump's chances of winning New Jersey are growingwww.newsweek.com@return2ozma to News • 3 days agomessage-square16
minus-square@return2ozmaOPlink-20•3 days agoA Republican hasn’t won New Jersey in 40 years. Biden needs to go. Put somebody better in.
minus-square@dhorklinkEnglish26•edit-23 days agoNew Jersey can embrace politicians who are corrupt assholes, but cannot abide ones who have a set bedtime.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink6•3 days agoSeems like that’s the case. So do we ignore it because it’s hypocritical?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•2 days agoLosing NJ because you dont want to appease hypocrites is pretty silly.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink16•3 days agoWe can vote someone better in 4 years, but he’s so so much better than trump.
minus-squareChozolinkfedilink3•3 days ago but he’s so so much better than trump. The thing is, New Jersey seems to disagree. That’s why we need a stronger candidate than Biden. I know that realistically, he’s probably the safest candidate against Trump, but that doesn’t mean that we have to be happy about it.
A Republican hasn’t won New Jersey in 40 years. Biden needs to go. Put somebody better in.
New Jersey can embrace politicians who are corrupt assholes, but cannot abide ones who have a set bedtime.
Seems like that’s the case. So do we ignore it because it’s hypocritical?
What else is there to do? There is no appeasement of hypocrites.
Losing NJ because you dont want to appease hypocrites is pretty silly.
We can vote someone better in 4 years, but he’s so so much better than trump.
The thing is, New Jersey seems to disagree. That’s why we need a stronger candidate than Biden. I know that realistically, he’s probably the safest candidate against Trump, but that doesn’t mean that we have to be happy about it.