Either with “folders” before the community name or assigning tags to the community. In either case it would be determined by the community creator.

  • HypersapienOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m not sure a collection that one person is in charge of maintaining is the best way to go. Communities organizing themselves into some kind of structure seems more in keeping with the spirit of the fediverse.

    • Pbody@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      I couldn’t agree more. My point wasn’t super clear upon read through. I meant users can create their own groups to organize things for themselves. I guess they can share these collections of the want is there but it’s mostly just an organizational thing per user in my mind. Like multireddits if you’ve ever used them.

      • HypersapienOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        See my description of how the tags would work below for more details

        • Pbody@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          I like the idea of that. So basically it’s be a community driven tag system with local user customization to further narrow down your tagged sections?

          • HypersapienOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            I wasn’t thinking of user customization, but if they can make it work, sure.

            • Pbody@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              That could also be a feature of any apps that get made as well. This could be the easiest route for the user customization side.