300 million lbs of fireworks and 2.7 billion dollars gone in a cloud of smoke.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    115 months ago

    For pollution, at least CO2, 300M lb is 136k metric tons. I didn’t know the water to CO2 ratio for solid rocket motors, but I’d guess maybe half is CO2. Cars produce 1.5B tons of CO2 per year in the US, so the CO2 would be about equivalent to about 24 min of driving cars. That doesn’t seem too unreasonable.

    But maybe you were taking about the metals? I don’t know how much of an issue those are.

    • @someguy3
      link
      85 months ago

      Unfortunately this isn’t complete combustion. There’s a shit ton of PM and everything else. Ever go to a big show? They have to take pauses for the smoke to clear so that you can see the next batch.

        • @someguy3
          link
          95 months ago

          You do know that CO, SOx, NOx etc is worse that CO2 right?

            • @someguy3
              link
              3
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Acid rain ain’t no problem huh.

              Post said “unnecessary pollution”.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                15 months ago

                Everything is unnecessary. We could just off ourselves and there’d be no more pollution. The only reason our existence matter is the way we feel about it. Which is the same reason fireworks matter.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                15 months ago

                That depends on a lot more factors for how dilute it gets. I didn’t know how likely it is for the air currents to dilute the aluminum exhaust over a large enough area before it rains. Maybe someone could do some analysis, but I don’t know how.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              05 months ago

              You shoud do a calculation and show the expected change in global temperature from a fireworks show.

              • @Feathercrown
                link
                English
                15 months ago

                That number is close to meaningless. Also don’t ask others to do large amounts of research in a lemmy comment, it won’t be accurate.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            35 months ago

            It’s not worse, it’s different. CO2 kills everything on earth but that takes a lot of it. The toxins you listed can give a community long term health issues without that much exposure. It’s a local problem vs a global problem.

    • @Bertuccio
      link
      4
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      The particulate matter, specifically heavy metals, go through the roof.

      There’s also a bunch of paperwork involved in removing those measurements from the pollution data sets with a rule that gives a pass for fireworks.

    • Tarquinn2049
      link
      15 months ago

      Sorry, completely off-topic, but your name keeps reminding me of rock-a-doodle. I know his name is completely different, but it has the same flow and a really similar sound. Chanticleer. Prounounced Chant Eclair, a french pun for “sing loud and clear”.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      15 months ago

      Personally I think it’s important to understand Co2 emissions aren’t the only factors in the pollution of air quality. Like you mentioned, heavy metals are a big factor in climate (for example how private jets still use leaded fuel).