• @[email protected]M
    link
    fedilink
    -4
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Fair enough. Can you send me a link to whatever source you are using for this theology? (assuming you didnt just make it up)

        • Veraxus
          link
          55 months ago

          Well, if you have one you should read it some time. But since most english versions are awful at best, and deliberately deceptive at worst, I recommend the one I linked.

          • @[email protected]M
            link
            fedilink
            -45 months ago

            Ad hominem

            Unjustified claim

            nth challenge to theological position ignored in favor of the above-mentioned

            • Veraxus
              link
              65 months ago

              You asked where my plain recitation of scripture comes from, and I answered you. If you don’t like that scripture doesn’t support your wickedness, that’s between you and God, not me. That you can only attack me rather than the scripture itself is telling. 😞

              • @[email protected]M
                link
                fedilink
                -5
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Ignores the term exegesis which exists because objectivity is impossible when reading historical texts

                Doubles down on anachronistic interpretation that projects modern poltical and social climate onto 2000 year old scriptures which by own admission require anthropological awareness

                Another ad hominem for good measure

                Won’t touch argument about origin of the scriptural canon with a ten foot pole