• @Allonzee
    link
    117
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Reminds me of why torture as a means of information gathering is ridiculous.

    I will absolutely tell you what I think you want to hear when you start stabbing me, whether its the truth or I ever knew it at all.

    But I also hate you for torturing me, so If I do happen to know the thing then I also know enough about the thing to alter the answer to something false but plausible for a moment of relief while you act on it, because we all know if you’re torturing me, you have no intention of letting me out alive.

    This is why the lets be pals/wine and dine approach is more effective.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      206 months ago

      Well, real pros say:

      “Thanks for finally providing some info. We are going to go corroborate it. If you lied, or if we can’t find convincing evidence your info was right, we will take this conversation up with your wife/kid/family”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          66 months ago

          Joel pretended to do that in the last of us, only to turn around saying “I believe your friend” and killing the second guy immediately.

          • Zoot
            link
            fedilink
            56 months ago

            Well they really shouldn’t have stabbed him to begin with!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      166 months ago

      This is why I liked the how Torture skill in Burning Wheel does just this: you decide what the victim says. It’s not true, it’s just what they admit to.

    • skulblaka
      link
      fedilink
      126 months ago

      Yeah but I have a friendly cleric. Zone of Truth doesn’t care about how you feel regarding your interrogation.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        7
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Zone of truth removes the need for torture. You can interrogate someone without causing physical or psychological harm.

        • skulblaka
          link
          fedilink
          116 months ago

          They do still have the option to remain silent, though, as per the spell text. It doesn’t compel an answer, it only compels any spoken word to be the truth as you know it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          56 months ago

          You don’t torture for the truth, though… causing physical and psychological harm is the whole point.

    • @NegativeInf
      link
      116 months ago

      Which is why you get the deets, stab anyways, check for accuracy. If incorrect, revive, repeat.

      • @kautau
        link
        36 months ago

        The CIA hates this one weird trick!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      56 months ago

      Read the manual.

      Pain can be efficient or counterproductive depending on the individual. The threat or pain is usually more efficient than the pain itself. Your “let’s be pal” approach is not far from the KUBARK’s recommendations, but it is not incompatible with coercitive methods: On the contrary several of these consist in putting the interrogatee in a state where the interrogator is perceived as a reassuring presence.

      Context about the kubark manual on Wikipedia

    • Natanael
      link
      fedilink
      26 months ago

      That what the brits did to get Germans to talk in WW2