@[email protected] to News • 6 months agoJudge says FTC lacks authority to issue rule banning noncompete agreementsarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square50fedilinkarrow-up1524arrow-down16file-text
arrow-up1518arrow-down1external-linkJudge says FTC lacks authority to issue rule banning noncompete agreementsarstechnica.com@[email protected] to News • 6 months agomessage-square50fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink30•6 months agoYou missed the news where the Supremos say they’re the only regulators that matter now. In the decision before that they legalized bribery.
minus-squareI Cast Fistlinkfedilink12•6 months agoNot bribery, just a surprise gift after doing a favor without being promised anything in return! Totally different thing, you guys!! /s
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•6 months agoYou know they’ll start pulling shit like ‘You do this new thing for me and I’ll tip you for that other thing you did for me in the past <wink>’
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•edit-26 months agoA gratuity of 10k. I guess for the corrupt members of the court, $10k and $10 are about the same.
You missed the news where the Supremos say they’re the only regulators that matter now. In the decision before that they legalized bribery.
Not bribery, just a surprise gift after doing a favor without being promised anything in return! Totally different thing, you guys!! /s
You know they’ll start pulling shit like ‘You do this new thing for me and I’ll tip you for that other thing you did for me in the past <wink>’
A gratuity of 10k. I guess for the corrupt members of the court, $10k and $10 are about the same.