The Greens promised to push Labour to be more radical but are instead acting how they always have: pro nimby, anti-environment.

I didn’t vote Green, obviously. If I had, I imagine I’d be pretty angry that pretty much their first act having quadrupled their number of MPs was to oppose green development.

  • flamingos-cantM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    322 months ago

    He wants the cabling to be put underground, instead of using pylons. You can disagree with him (I do) but it’s pretty disingenuous to say he ‘opposes green development’ just because he doesn’t immediately rubber stamp every policy labelled green.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 months ago

      Putting it underground is worse for the environment in and of itself, because of the direct damage to soil and plantlife (and so indirect damage to animal life). It’s also more expensive, which leaves you with less money to spend (on, e.g., just picking an example at random, green development). And it takes longer, which means relying on fossil fuels for longer.

      So, his proposed solution is worse for the environment in three different ways. If his solution is less green than the thing he’s opposing, then it’s fair to say he opposes green development.

      • DarkThoughts
        link
        fedilink
        162 months ago

        It’s not great, but both methods have their pros and cons, even for the environment. But you are very clearly pushing some bullshit anti Greens agenda here, which is even worse for green development.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 months ago

          There’s no bullshit involved. I have an anti-Green agenda because I have a pro-green agenda. Both in and out of power, the Greens oppose actual green development in favour of nimbyism. They have shown this in this case by immediately using their much-vaunted quadrupling in representation to oppose a project which would help meet the goal of decarbonising the grid by 2030. This is very much part of a pattern.

          Whatever my limited influence on green development, I can guarantee it’s of smaller impact than Ramsay’s nimbyism.

              • DarkThoughts
                link
                fedilink
                32 months ago

                If you have to use a conservative corpo source then I have barely any other choice than that. But you continue your capitalistic propaganda shit.

                • @[email protected]OP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 months ago

                  It doesn’t matter who says ‘This Green politician opposes solar farms’ because this Green politician does oppose solar farms. Ranting about capitalist propaganda does not change the facts

                  • DarkThoughts
                    link
                    fedilink
                    22 months ago

                    It does, especially when you project your claim onto the entire party.