I am not allowed to credit the site that has this disaster. Its owner said “Nobody should see that”

  • @[email protected]
    1•2 months ago

    Huh, neat. The last time I looked, chrome was also plagued by this. Might actually re-start some projects I had, but it sucks to have to use chrome.

    inline-flex is indeed necessary since we’re growing left to right and flex would take the entire/fixed width, unless it’s also inside a flexbox.

    • @[email protected]English
      1•2 months ago

      it sucks to have to use chrome

      I also hate to admit it, but Chrome currently is the superior browser.

      • @[email protected]
        1•2 months ago

        Chromium is a superior engine, yes. But Chrome itself, at least in my eyes, looks to be the least capable browser out of the bunch. I’d rather Vivaldi if I had to switch.

    • @Aux
      1•2 months ago

      Inline is never needed and you already know that.

      • @[email protected]
        1•2 months ago

        EDIT: Alright, this is a terrible case because the parent element has flex and therefore no inline-flex is necessary there, but I’d argue it’s the parent element being flex that is redundant, rather than child element being inline.

        • @Aux
          1•2 months ago

          Inline means that your element should be treated like text. If your element is not text, then you shouldn’t use inline. In this screenshot the element is text, so it’s ok.