• @hime0321
    link
    English
    5
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    “They own several sections of track and you forgot to mention that it’s the most popular publicly owned transit in the US.” I don’t know how you came to the conclusion that I said the New York subway is federal. I said that it is actually the most popular public transportation in the US. Okay cool some countries have less than 1000 miles of rail, I’m sure I could have figured that out on my own. But the US has 160,000 miles and 750 of that is, guess what, .4%. So yes it’s fucking small compared to the total rail in the US. My idea of large is not skewed in the slightest, 160,000 is much bigger than 750, simple maths. Yeah short lines are a thing, and guess what, they are not long. It honestly makes no sense that you are comparing amtrack to countries that don’t have much rail, when the entire conversation is about US rail. Like I can say that the US has more miles of road than Cuba, but that has no impact on how many of the roads are paved vs dirt in the US. That’s pretty much what you are saying. Let me put it this way, there was approximately 245 billion miles traveled in 2021 for European passenger rail. While for the same year amtrack had 12.1 million miles traveled. Which if you do the math is .005%.

    • @Madison420
      link
      -225 days ago

      How exactly is state regulated state funded subway relevant to federally regulated partially federally funded railroads? It’s not in my opinion but if you’re going somewhere with it I’m intrigued.

      Correct, it’s not gigantic but for a federal rail system even the “small” Amtrak section it in itself isn’t small.

      Nope, I think it’s skewed. If you think that small section isn’t enough for governmental interest in lack of regulation I think you’re absolutely mistaken.

      Much like how the NYC subway is in no way related to federal rail or federally regulated rail. I don’t even think mta handles hazmat in any way at all whatsoever so how does it matter in relation to chemical spills?

      Again, I think you’re simply not willing to connect the dots.

      Btw that’s 137000 miles of publicly funded highly regulated passenger rail which by your account we have 750 miles. And you claim I’m bringing up irrelevant stuff.

      • @hime0321
        link
        English
        124 days ago

        They are both passenger rail. It’s relevant because I responded to your claim that amtrack is the most popular public transportation. It’s not, NYC subway is. How is that not relevant? That’s still small, you can’t compare a small country with fewer people and little rail infrastructure and draw relevant conclusions. So when you properly compare to countries that have populations and rail infrastructure that is comparable you can draw relevant conclusions. Which is why in my last response I chose to compare it to the EU. I never talked about lack of regulations and the Feds interest in it. That would be you projecting. And also the lack of regulation is because of the 4 main rail companies that lobby to keep it the way it is. Not because of the government’s interest in the lack of regulation. I never claimed that the NYC subway moves hazmat. They are passenger rail not freight. Idk what “dots” you want me to connect, but you definitely need some better reading comprehension. I honestly do not understand how you think that US rail is publicly funded. It is not. The railroad companies own the railroads and maintain them. There is 750 miles of rail that amtrack directly owns. They have cost-sharing agreements with states that they operate in, on lines less than 750 miles. Anything over 750 miles receives federal financial support. So the 750 miles that amtrack directly owns is publicly funded. And the rest that they use from the railroad companies gets some public funding. But that is still less than 22,000 miles compared to the 160,000 miles of US rail.

        • @Madison420
          link
          -124 days ago

          It’s not relevant because they do not do hazmat at all, Amtrak rails are shared with commercial rail often including hazmat.

          Yes you can, I can compare an apple and the planet Venus. You’re confusing inability with inanity and you’re still wrong, it’s a reasonable comparison.

          Agreed, it was my point and you can’t seem to absorb it and on fact are arguing that the conflict doesn’t exist because “Amtrak small”. The 4 main companies that lobby a regulatory agency soft on actual regulation because of perverse federal incentive.

          I didn’t say you did, I said NYC subway is a shit comparison because it doesn’t take part in the subject of the conversation. Tomatoes are delicious too but it’s entirely irrelevant because it’s not related to the subject in any way.

          The feds own track that they find federally, are you actually too dense to accept your own position? Then you subsequently explain how exactly rail is publicly funded. Amazing.

          • @hime0321
            link
            English
            024 days ago

            I just can’t even. Like I explain how something like 23,000 miles of rail gets some public funding and you say that’s the entire 160,000 miles of rail. The only federal rail is the rail owned by amtrack, which is 750 miles.

            I’m done. You’re too fucking dense, with the reading comprehension of a fucking brick. I literally answered all of that in my last comment.

            • @Madison420
              link
              024 days ago

              Clearly. The amount is irrelevant, the incentive to not be regulated to make more profit is the save as any private company but private companies don’t own and control regulatory agencies, the federal government does.

              You didn’t, and haven’t. You’re simply shitty at connect the dots. Apparently perverse incentive to you is a ok.

              • @hime0321
                link
                English
                024 days ago

                Holy fucking shit. The rail companies own the rail. Two federal agencies regulate rail and cargo on rail. The private companies that own the rail have an incentive to keep costs low. They do this by maintaining the rail as cheaply as they can. They also lobby the government to keep regulations relaxed so they don’t have to maintain as much. The government doesn’t care one single bit about the cost to maintain rail, their only incentive is taking the lobby money. Like maybe you should figure out how to connect the dots. And again reading comprehension is not your strong suit.

                • @Madison420
                  link
                  024 days ago

                  Sure, most of the rail aside from the 750 miles we both agree is 100% federally owned. You’re being obtuse.

                  Why do you believe a for profit company ran by the government has any less motivation to have limited regulation for the purposes of making a larger profit.

                  This isn’t hard you’re just being dumb.

                  • @hime0321
                    link
                    English
                    024 days ago

                    No, it’s not fucking federally owned. ONLY THE 750 MILES IS FEDERALLY OWNED. Again reading comprehension. I never said amtrack has any less motivation to have limited regulations. You are constantly shoving words down my throat that I never said, somehow coming to conclusions that are not even close to what I am saying. I’m just going to block you so I don’t have to deal with the mental capacity of a brick.