minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink12•1 month agoBecause they prefer electing republicans to winning if the cost of winning would be compromising even a fraction of an inch with the left
minus-squareOptionalOPlink-2•1 month agoChange, historically speaking, has taken a long time. Less so now.
Because they are shit at engagement, as proven since 1984
Because they prefer electing republicans to winning if the cost of winning would be compromising even a fraction of an inch with the left
Change, historically speaking, has taken a long time. Less so now.
Obama got people excited in 2008