• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      232 months ago

      The Supreme Court just granted immunity to President Biden, so he can send him and the other traitors to Guantanamo without fear of legal repercussions. Of course not, nothing’s going to happen.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        8
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        This seems to be a common misconception.

        The Supreme Court did not give Biden immunity. They gave the president immunity for carrying out official acts. Who determines what an official act is? The Supreme Court.

        Biden doesn’t have immunity. I’d argue he doesn’t have immunity as president, either.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          112 months ago

          That’s the thing about this though. I’d like to see them try to prevent that from within Guantanamo. It’s not legal neither moral, yet it can’t be stopped using the law.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          82 months ago

          True, but Republicans seem to have taken the position that you can do whatever you want while the consequences work their way through the courts.

              • @ikidd
                link
                English
                22 months ago

                So… next week?

            • @SkyezOpen
              link
              32 months ago

              He has it if he wants it. He just has to gulag the justices. By the time the case makes it to the supreme court, it’s all his own people. “Oh why yes, a president certainly can gulag whoever he deems an enemy of the state.”

        • AmbiguousProps
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Kind of hard to rule from a jail cell, and I’m guessing that he’d have died of old age by the time something like this was ruled on, regardless. I say, go out with a legacy of giving the court (and the GOP) what they deserve.

    • @AshMan85
      link
      9
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Yeah… they are impeaching him.

      • @Sanctus
        link
        English
        222 months ago

        With the Republicans holding the House? Lmao

        • @AshMan85
          link
          12 months ago

          Didn’t say it would work.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -3
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Who held the House during Trumps impeachments? I honestly don’t remember, but I guess I’m assuming it was the Democrats.

          • @lennybird
            link
            English
            152 months ago

            It was, and even if they had a slim majority it doesn’t matter. To actually remove a Justice they’d need a 2/3 vote supermajority in the Senate.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Thanks. Yeah it’s not going to happen, sadly.

              (And thank you for not harping on whatever the hell that autocorrect error was lol holy hell)

      • @NABDad
        link
        English
        92 months ago

        I’m not going to hold my breath.