Nato members have pledged their support for an “irreversible path” to future membership for Ukraine, as well as more aid.

While a formal timeline for it to join the military alliance was not agreed at a summit in Washington DC, the military alliance’s 32 members said they had “unwavering” support for Ukraine’s war effort.

Nato has also announced further integration with Ukraine’s military and members have committed €40bn ($43.3bn, £33.7bn) in aid in the next year, including F-16 fighter jets and air defence support.

The bloc’s Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said: “Support to Ukraine is not charity - it is in our own security interest.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -425 months ago

    NATO is an arm of American imperialism so it’s relevant to the article and conversation at hand.

    • @Maalus
      link
      English
      245 months ago

      So if the US gets out of Nato like Trump promised, what then? It magically disolves because there are no sovereign countries in there? Or is it still an arm of american imperialism and all ze eviilz in the world?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -295 months ago

        It would definitely weaken a ton although I doubt it would immediately dissolve, although its power is heavily based on our leadership and military and anyone who doesn’t see that is pretty naive. Hopefully Europe would help Ukraine enough to make up for us having Trump and probably not helping them anymore, though.

        • @Maalus
          link
          English
          205 months ago

          That wasn’t my question.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -235 months ago

            It wasn’t a good question nor was it asked in good faith. I answered what I could with some context. It’s like asking if we know the world would have no wars after we got rid of the Nazis and all the evil in the world would disappear. Well, no, obviously not, but that it doesn’t mean it wouldn’t improve things.

            • @Maalus
              link
              English
              205 months ago

              It was a regular question that doesn’t fit within your narrow view of “US bad everybody evil because puppets of US”

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -21
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Okay, that’s quite the straw man, but now I get your confusion, because you’re making up arguments you think I’m making. I never said “everybody evil because puppets of US”.

                I made a single sentence criticizing NATO (because often America is bad believe it or not and they’re the main superpower behind it). Everything else you’re assuming or making up. People can believe other non-US countries, including Russia or China or other Western countries, can be bad, can support Ukraine in their war against Russia, and still think that NATO is an arm of US imperialism. Some people are capable of holding these multiple non-conflicting thoughts in their head at the same time. It’s not whataboutism, because it’s related to NATO the whole topic of this thread, it’s just adding to the conversation and exploring the nuance of it all. But I forgot that NATO and the US can do no wrong and is a perfect angel at all times, so that’s my fault for saying anything. Would you feel better if I said Western imperialism so it wasn’t so specific to the US, though?

                • @Maalus
                  link
                  English
                  145 months ago

                  No you said “Nato is an arm of american imperialism” which literally means “everybody evil because puppets of US”.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    -95 months ago

                    That’s a huge simplification of what that means. But if you’re going to deny the long history of NATO being an extension of American power and a way to legitimize their military conflicts around the world from Libya to Iraq, then there isn’t really anywhere to go next in this conversation.

        • @Freefall
          link
          English
          85 months ago

          Probably not helping them? You mean against a trump US joining the Russians. The dude really wants us on the evil side of WW3.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -45 months ago

            He could remove aid but I doubt he could convince Congress and the American people to help Russia. Plus, his whole pro-Russia thing with respect to the war has been posed as an isolation thing. Maybe I’m wrong, though. He’s not afraid to be a hypocrite. A Trump candidacy is depressing and I’ve been trying not to dwell on the possibility of it tbh.