Nato members have pledged their support for an “irreversible path” to future membership for Ukraine, as well as more aid.

While a formal timeline for it to join the military alliance was not agreed at a summit in Washington DC, the military alliance’s 32 members said they had “unwavering” support for Ukraine’s war effort.

Nato has also announced further integration with Ukraine’s military and members have committed €40bn ($43.3bn, £33.7bn) in aid in the next year, including F-16 fighter jets and air defence support.

The bloc’s Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said: “Support to Ukraine is not charity - it is in our own security interest.”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Yeah, most of these responses from me now aren’t fully for the people I’m talking to, Tankies here argue in INCREDIBLY bad faith, they lie about their intentions and purposely leave out parts of their beliefs they know are unpalatable, so I block the people I’m responding to fairly quickly. But I put rebuttles up when I have spare emotional/mental energy so that those who read can start seeing these guys for what they are (obsessed with violent revolution)

      • @FiskFisk33
        link
        English
        24 months ago

        Sure, but that’s not why they picked it

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      55 months ago

      I’m not gas lighting you and I didn’t know that was the intended acronym of .ml

      If that’s true then I will be moving instance.

      BTW I’ve not been blocked (to my knowledge) by anyone- I’ve just had a couple of instances where I’ve been in discussion with someone and when they turn to ad hominem attacks they’ve called me a tankie or some such. Regardless of what was being discussed or my views.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      45 months ago

      Wait, people actually think Russia or China would be any different of they had the US’ influence? That’s crazy. It’s like folks never heard that quote that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.

      Any country that ends up with that amount of influence will inevitably resort to bs to maintain that power, even if it was a harmless, pacifistic country like Switzerland.

      • @UnderpantsWeevil
        link
        English
        -1
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Wait, people actually think Russia or China would be any different of they had the US’ influence?

        They’ve got different leaders, different economies, and different cultures. Brazil, India, and Indonesia would also be different were they to enjoy US influence.

        Any country that ends up with that amount of influence will inevitably resort to bs to maintain that power

        There’s a big difference between soft influence and hard military power. In the wake of WW2, the US enjoyed both by being the last major industrial power still standing. This offered their financial sector an enormous amount of sway in how developing/recovering countries reentered the industrial world. Similarly, they only had one remaining international military peer by the end of the war (in part because they helped the USSR rearm in the wake of German continental invasion). So they were free to throw out both banks and military bases on a global scale.

        But all of this was a consequence of a unique historical moment, created at the end of the 19th century colonial era and perpetuated by the US/Soviet schism during the Cold War.

        We’re no longer in a Cold War, we don’t have a single globe-spanning economic superpower, the US has repeated demonstrated an inability to project its military across hemispheres, and the soft financial power of the western states has eroded significantly since the 2008 financial crisis.

        The BS we’re seeing today is not a failure of large influential blocks to maintain influence. Its a failure of a large mercantile system to reconcile with the contradictions of an economy that demands infinite continuous upward growth.

        If the US focused on internal development, rather than profit-seeking outsourcing, China and India would be integrated partners rather than rivalrous superpowers. If the US had struck a detante with the USSR and integrated their economies, rather than playing wack-a-mole with anti-colonialist uprisings across Latin America, Asia, and Africa for sixty years, we’d have a more stable industrial base and fewer poverty-driven insurrections. If the US had stopped sucking at the teet of Middle Eastern fossil fuels and pivoted to green/nuclear energy back in the 60s/70s when the time was ripe, we wouldn’t be staring down the barrel of a climate apocalypse that threatens all the capital accumulation we’ve achieved to date. And we wouldn’t have the Radical Islamic Extremism boogeyman to whip everyone into a terrified lather.

        There are so many moments when things could have gone differently (for better or worse - I guess we could be living in Nuclear Winter right now). This history is not a given and the future is not set in stone.

      • @hark
        link
        English
        -24 months ago

        They would also be abusive, but currently the country projecting the most power in the world is undoubtedly the US. It’s not good to have a single world power that is so dominant. Us peasants are given little goodies if the ruling class feels the need to compete instead of simply occupying the number one spot in the world uncontested.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -35 months ago

        I have a VERY hard time believing you’re in .ml and haven’t seen users acting like Russia and China can do no wrong

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I usually browse by all, but you’re right, I’ve seen people defending them. Though thinking they would be saints if they had the power is insane to me.

          Hexbear and Lemmygrad though, have incredibly weird takes to me, especially on Ukraine.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            24 months ago

            Fair enough, it doesnt sound like I’d have any problems with you in particular, not that you need to justify yourself to me

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              24 months ago

              To be fair, I only joined .ml because .world wasn’t a thing when I joined and srlpnk and a few others had closed registrations at that time

    • @SeattleRain
      link
      English
      45 months ago

      What’s hexbear? Another instance?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        05 months ago

        It was the most Tankie toxic instance that was around during the reddit migration, once the Gaza shitshow started full scale, they were celebrating the slaughter of Isreali citizens that Isreal used as an excuse to up their warcrimes on Gaza. Most of the new lemmy migrants realised real quick we had no tolerance for these bloodthirsty fucks and started blocking them en mass, at that point .ml was relatively low radar despite what ml stands for, but as more of us started blocking anything and everything hexbear, ml started recieving more users who werent satisfied being disgusting in silence

        • @SeattleRain
          link
          English
          35 months ago

          Oh I see. I’m not a tankie but Israeli civilians are really just settlers working to uphold apartheid and genocide. Most Israeli civilians have been killed by their own IDF. I can’t feel sorry for them since they made a deal with the devil.

            • @SeattleRain
              link
              English
              75 months ago

              Enjoy being on the wrong side of history.

                • @SeattleRain
                  link
                  English
                  04 months ago

                  The irony is that you think the lives Hama took justifies the extermination of Palestinians.

                  • @TokenBoomer
                    link
                    English
                    14 months ago

                    The irony was that Kedly thought you would agree with them about Gaza, you didn’t.